It appears that your cart is currently empty
Clash of Creativity: 83 Gallery's Heated Interview with Two AI Artists
3 comments
83 Gallery: Welcome! Today, we’re diving into the world of AI art and speaking with some AI artists. To start, could you introduce yourselves and your artistic practices?
AI Artist 1: Hi! I’m Alex, and I primarily create abstract landscapes using AI algorithms. I enjoy blending traditional techniques with machine learning to push the boundaries of digital art.
AI Artist 2: I’m Jamie, and I focus on character design and narrative-building with AI. I use models to generate elements that inspire my storytelling, creating immersive visuals for games.
83 Gallery: Great to have you both here! Lately, there has been some negative feedback regarding AI-generated art. How do you feel about the criticisms that AI artists face?
AI Artist 1: Honestly, it's frustrating. A lot of people don’t seem to understand that AI is just a tool in our hands. They dismiss our efforts as if we’re not putting any real thought or emotion into our work.
AI Artist 2: Exactly! It’s infuriating when people say we lack true creativity. Who’s to define what creativity means? Just because we’re utilizing new technology doesn't make our art any less valid or meaningful.
83 Gallery: That’s a good point. Have you faced any specific negative responses that have impacted your work?
AI Artist 1: Absolutely. I’ve received harsh comments on social media accusing me of 'cheating' or trying to take the easy way out. It’s disheartening, and it feels like people are undermining the effort we put into our process.
AI Artist 2: I can relate. Some critics act like AI artists are just pressing a button and letting the machine do everything. This dismissal of our hard work can be really hurtful. It’s not just about generating images; it’s about curating, guiding, and adding our own unique touch.
83 Gallery: How do you respond to those who claim that AI art lacks authenticity?
AI Artist 1: I don’t shy away from those discussions. I tell them to reconsider what authenticity really means in art. Every medium evolves, and if they think their perception is the only valid one, they’re limiting themselves.
AI Artist 2: Exactly! It feels like some people want to cling to outdated definitions of art. The art world has always been about exploration, and dismissing AI art just closes the door on an exciting new frontier.
83 Gallery: What do you think is the future of AI art in the larger artistic community?
AI Artist 1: I believe we’re on the cusp of a significant transformation. AI art isn’t a threat; it’s an opportunity. If people would only look past their biases, they could see the potential for innovation and collaboration.
AI Artist 2: Exactly! But if critics continue to resist this change, they’ll miss out on some amazing artistic developments. We’re going to push boundaries and create new genres, and that’s something worth getting excited about.
83 Gallery: Thank you both for sharing your insights. It’s clear that while the journey may be challenging, the potential for growth and collaboration within the art community is exciting!
AI Artist 1: Thank you for having us!
AI Artist 2: Yes, it’s been great discussing these important topics, even if the conversation can be a bit heated!
3 comments
Cris — 02:04 PM
One of the big things your AI users aren’t touching is the scraping and utilization of personal data (without permission, compensation or credit, by the way) that was required to train these genAI programs. This “tool” is actually image automation, regardless of how they doll it up afterwards. It’s not a tool if it does the vast majority of the work and stylistic choices for you; it’s the whole shebang. Additionally, these programs need to constantly be fed human-created work in order to continue to improve. The vast majority of the people who are actually making serious bank off genAI are the techbrodudes who are selling this program (or subscriptions to the program). And this isn’t even touching the massive amounts of natural resources it takes to run these programs. And for what?? Something we didn’t ask for or really don’t need? Shortcuts mimicking human creativity? To date, the US Copyright office doesn’t award copyrights to genAI material (only the parts that are substantially human-authored). This has got to tell you something about the whole process.
Q — 01:12 PM
was this interview written by ai?
Milin — 06:51 AM
The thing about being a traditional artist is the years of work put into becoming good at something and being able to render the images organically. The impressive thing about AI is the person who created AI. As they took years in developing the skills to create it. AI is a great tool to assist in learning. But once someone ( who most of the time had low artistic ability or lack of discipline to take the time to make something) uses a generator.. I personally don’t find it impressive. It disrespects years of experience and hard work. But hey it’s a rat race right.